1452 - NK10 CFV
1452 - NK10 CFV
(23 Jan 2024, 5:29 am)Spottybus I didn’t say that I don’t like Pulsars, I’m saying that the reason why I think it be better to give Darlington 7 pulsars from Stockton because the pulsars will probably last longer than the E300s at Darlington then the E300s at Stockton can go on locals while the Streetlites can go on longer routes that’s why they’re having work done to them to make them more reliable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk-**
transfer Darlington litres to Stockton
(23 Jan 2024, 5:29 am)Spottybus I didn’t say that I don’t like Pulsars, I’m saying that the reason why I think it be better to give Darlington 7 pulsars from Stockton because the pulsars will probably last longer than the E300s at Darlington then the E300s at Stockton can go on locals while the Streetlites can go on longer routes that’s why they’re having work done to them to make them more reliable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk-**
transfer Darlington litres to Stockton
Why would Stockton get 1602-1614 for, it would be easier to give Darlington 7 pulsars from Stockton so the pulsars can last longer at Darlington then Stockton can have the 7 E300s on locals while the Streetlites 1550-1573 can just go on anything because they are getting work done to them to make them more reliable even tho 1550-1559 have already been done
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(23 Jan 2024, 7:44 pm)Spottybus Why would Stockton get 1602-1614 for, it would be easier to give Darlington 7 pulsars from Stockton so the pulsars can last longer at Darlington then Stockton can have the 7 E300s on locals while the Streetlites 1550-1573 can just go on anything because they are getting work done to them to make them more reliable even tho 1550-1559 have already been done
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(23 Jan 2024, 7:44 pm)Spottybus Why would Stockton get 1602-1614 for, it would be easier to give Darlington 7 pulsars from Stockton so the pulsars can last longer at Darlington then Stockton can have the 7 E300s on locals while the Streetlites 1550-1573 can just go on anything because they are getting work done to them to make them more reliable even tho 1550-1559 have already been done
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(23 Jan 2024, 8:02 pm)Storx I don't know where the buses are going but surely this would be better:
2/2A: Enviro 300's
1/2/57/57A (Ashington): 1584 - 1589 with the rest of the batch
Pulsars stay at Stockton
2841/2852-2854/2859: Withdrawn
New business case in for the replacement of the E300's, which technically have replaced the gas buses, I wouldn't be surprised one bit if these are part of the Tees Valley ZEBRA 2 bid but it hasn't been leaked yet, I know it's one of the 9 priority corridors according to: https://teesvalley-ca.gov.uk/travel/wp-c...c-22-5.pdf.
Also to note all the old crap also going to Redcar, is the 63 or X2/X3/X4 another route? They're 2 of the other priority corridors.
The Solo's are a complete nuisance that Darlington dumped up here, as an understatement, with constant breakdowns.
(23 Jan 2024, 8:02 pm)Storx I don't know where the buses are going but surely this would be better:
2/2A: Enviro 300's
1/2/57/57A (Ashington): 1584 - 1589 with the rest of the batch
Pulsars stay at Stockton
2841/2852-2854/2859: Withdrawn
New business case in for the replacement of the E300's, which technically have replaced the gas buses, I wouldn't be surprised one bit if these are part of the Tees Valley ZEBRA 2 bid but it hasn't been leaked yet, I know it's one of the 9 priority corridors according to: https://teesvalley-ca.gov.uk/travel/wp-c...c-22-5.pdf.
Also to note all the old crap also going to Redcar, is the 63 or X2/X3/X4 another route? They're 2 of the other priority corridors.
The Solo's are a complete nuisance that Darlington dumped up here, as an understatement, with constant breakdowns.
(23 Jan 2024, 7:44 pm)Spottybus Why would Stockton get 1602-1614 for, it would be easier to give Darlington 7 pulsars from Stockton so the pulsars can last longer at Darlington then Stockton can have the 7 E300s on locals while the Streetlites 1550-1573 can just go on anything because they are getting work done to them to make them more reliable even tho 1550-1559 have already been done
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
it would be better if Stockton was just streetlites from Darlington and Durham then cast the pulsars off to Darlington Durham
(23 Jan 2024, 9:14 pm)Mike_98 To be fair that seems like a good idea but I would say send the Solos to Redcar instead of withdrawing them as they will be handy for any Repairs that Whitby’s current 3 and Redcar 1 need. Maybe even use in service for a while or as spares as Redcar have 0 spares right now. At the moment it’s actually the Pulsars having problems and the Temsas are keeping Redcar going. But them solos would be soo useful for them right now. Redcars 2 E300s ain’t to bad either atm.
i agree with the other two e300 been at Redcar I 100% agree there
(23 Jan 2024, 7:44 pm)Spottybus Why would Stockton get 1602-1614 for, it would be easier to give Darlington 7 pulsars from Stockton so the pulsars can last longer at Darlington then Stockton can have the 7 E300s on locals while the Streetlites 1550-1573 can just go on anything because they are getting work done to them to make them more reliable even tho 1550-1559 have already been done
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
it would be better if Stockton was just streetlites from Darlington and Durham then cast the pulsars off to Darlington Durham
(23 Jan 2024, 9:14 pm)Mike_98 To be fair that seems like a good idea but I would say send the Solos to Redcar instead of withdrawing them as they will be handy for any Repairs that Whitby’s current 3 and Redcar 1 need. Maybe even use in service for a while or as spares as Redcar have 0 spares right now. At the moment it’s actually the Pulsars having problems and the Temsas are keeping Redcar going. But them solos would be soo useful for them right now. Redcars 2 E300s ain’t to bad either atm.
i agree with the other two e300 been at Redcar I 100% agree there
