![]() |
Tyne and Wear Metro - Printable Version +- North East Buses (https://northeastbuses.co.uk/forums) +-- Forum: Other Forms of Transport (https://northeastbuses.co.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Forum: Railways (https://northeastbuses.co.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Thread: Tyne and Wear Metro (/showthread.php?tid=68) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
|
RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - Economic505 - 30 Jan 2024 (26 Jan 2024, 12:20 am)The busmanT wrote Introduction of new trains further delayed (summer now rumoured) Delayed to end of 2024 according to Chronicle today (30/01). Is the manufacturer the same one that are having issues with Mersey Rail? RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - 54APhotography - 30 Jan 2024 (29 Oct 2023, 10:28 am)Storx wrote The general idea is you'd have the 'express' service running 2 minutes in front of the slow stopper service. According to Nexus with the new trains (whenever that is likely to be), timetable enhancement would make it impossible for 'express' or limited stop services because of the signalling headway. The only possible way of changing that is cab signalling, which even then would reduce headways only by at best two minutes during the rush hour, given the intermediate Manors to Pelaw crush services. The cost of cab signalling is excessive to Nexus, and Network Rail won't install that on the Durham Coast. The structure of the timetabling is adequate. Focus on support for extensions, the most plausible being Pelaw to South Hylton via Washington, which operated as up and down loop trains. That is within the fleet capability, more trains would be needed for any adventure into Dunston, which would need immense funding, well beyond anything available regardless of who is in power. RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - Michael - 30 Jan 2024 (30 Jan 2024, 8:53 am)Economic505 wrote Delayed to end of 2024 according to Chronicle today (30/01). Is the manufacturer the same one that are having issues with Mersey Rail? Ye, Stadler Joke tbh, by the time they enter service, they'll need replacing again.... RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - Storx - 30 Jan 2024 (30 Jan 2024, 9:04 am)54APhotography wrote According to Nexus with the new trains (whenever that is likely to be), timetable enhancement would make it impossible for 'express' or limited stop services because of the signalling headway. The only possible way of changing that is cab signalling, which even then would reduce headways only by at best two minutes during the rush hour, given the intermediate Manors to Pelaw crush services. The cost of cab signalling is excessive to Nexus, and Network Rail won't install that on the Durham Coast. The structure of the timetabling is adequate. Long bump there, but don't see why they couldn't run the peak extras, non stop a few stations. As long as it doesn't catch up the train in front there's always 10 mins or so it could effectively 'catch' up the train in front. It was more about distributing the loads, more so than anything, than having the current problem where the peak train 2 minutes in front is slammed and the normal train is delayed sitting behind the peak train. Mind I still, and always will, think the South Hylton to Pelaw via fields and the outskirts of Washington is a monumental waste of money and time. I'd rather focus on getting a national rail service all the way through to Ferryhill instead personally. There's no sensible journeys, no-one from Sunderland wants to be on the outskirts of Washington and by the time most people travel to the outskirts of Washington on a bus, they might aswell stay on the same bus to Sunderland since the Metro goes around the world. Rail in the North East is a complete foreign idea to the Tyne and Wear councils though. RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - 54APhotography - 30 Jan 2024 (30 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm)Storx wrote Long bump there, but don't see why they couldn't run the peak extras, non stop a few stations. As long as it doesn't catch up the train in front there's always 10 mins or so it could effectively 'catch' up the train in front. It was more about distributing the loads, more so than anything, than having the current problem where the peak train 2 minutes in front is slammed and the normal train is delayed sitting behind the peak train.Washington is the only feasible route, Penshaw, Washington South and Wardley are very good opportunities to grow. Heavy Rail would serve nowhere bar Ferryhill after Washington South, Stillington is not worth the expense of a station. If there was demand between Stockton and Ferryhill, Arriva would run something. The region has been reliant on buses and personal transport largely since the early to mod sixties. My generation and the next had only arterial rail access. It is too late to try and develop South Durham for rail. The South Tyneside & Wearside loop makes sense for many reasons, one being greater utilisation of trains, and Wardley is a major player now, Metros each way would be ideal for Amazon workers. RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - Storx - 30 Jan 2024 (30 Jan 2024, 3:02 pm)54APhotography wrote Washington is the only feasible route, Penshaw, Washington South and Wardley are very good opportunities to grow. Heavy Rail would serve nowhere bar Ferryhill after Washington South, Stillington is not worth the expense of a station. If there was demand between Stockton and Ferryhill, Arriva would run something. It's not about the line itself though, it's about moving traffic off the East Coast Mainline to open new paths on there, you could even open paths for a local service on there so the likes of Chester Le Street, Saltwell, Birtley, Newton Hall etc. had a rail service which is more than the fields around South Hylton. For the Leamside Line itself, there's much more to the South of there aswell, such as Houghton Le Spring, Penshaw, Shiney Row etc which is being ignored. If you were really clever, you could also use the railway line as a catalyst for new development. We're desperate for new housing, if you built a station where that Rainton Meadows is then you could use those fields for new housing, they already have excellent road links being near the A1(M) and A690. Now you just need the transport side and it's sorted. It's a change from the usual where we build houses and then try to force some buses through. Also, if you were really innovative, you could create a new Sunderland Parkway station, extend the green line from Sunderland through to there and get some intercity trains stopping, ie one Cross Country and maybe a TPE service so people travelling to Sunderland have intercity trains without doubling back via Newcastle. There's so much more to the Leamside Line than the dead curve from Washington to Sunderland. Metro trains should be no-where near clogging those tracks up, going 50 mph - the only sensible more would be a short spur from Pelaw to Follingsby Park and extend the Pelaw peaks through (or run them all day). RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - 54APhotography - 30 Jan 2024 (30 Jan 2024, 3:48 pm)Storx wrote It's not about the line itself though, it's about moving traffic off the East Coast Mainline to open new paths on there, you could even open paths for a local service on there so the likes of Chester Le Street, Saltwell, Birtley, Newton Hall etc. had a rail service which is more than the fields around South Hylton. I agree with any reopening and cohesive plan between local and national government, developers and investors. Problem is there is no cohesive thinking, local politics is all about infighting and corruption. National politics much the same but with added ignorance of the North East. In theory there is another way of getting to Durham, via Wardley and Washington South, Hence houses and off the Leamside to Brasside and Newton Hall. How the metro would get to Durham Station is another matter. The other major issue is the Leamside would need massive re-engineering to be a real alternative, that means full electrification and 125mph linespeed. And even if that were possible, the bottleneck is still Darlington. You can't rebuild Northallerton to Ferryhill without monumental cost. Yarm viaduct is unlikely to be able to electrified without structural problems. If there were any serious commitment a completely new line needs building, then downgrade the ECML, would work out cheaper. Realistically very little is going to happen heavy rail wise up here. A new Government will be so hamstrung by the mess the Toriea have caused that one term will pass without anything good happening...... RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - Storx - 30 Jan 2024 (30 Jan 2024, 4:04 pm)54APhotography wrote I agree with any reopening and cohesive plan between local and national government, developers and investors. Problem is there is no cohesive thinking, local politics is all about infighting and corruption. National politics much the same but with added ignorance of the North East. I totally agreed, to be fair. Mind I think some of the slower trains wouldn't care as long as it's not too slow, if they're terminating at Newcastle anyway. It's a shame really like, personally I genuinely think there's more benefit to the line South of Washington rather than East to Sunderland. I still don't think they'll ever get that bit anyway and it'll end at Washington anyway, bridge too expensive or something as the excuse. One thing that would help though is if they let us control our trains, I know Burnham is trying to take control of the local services in Manchester and it would massively help, get the Tyne Valley, Northumberland Line, Durham Coast and imo Leamside Line in it's own little sub rail network. Btw when you said there's nothing South of Ferryhill, one thing I'd love to see is to cut the corner off at Newton Aycliffe and open Bishop Auckland / Shildon to Newcastle services. I'm surprised it's never been mentioned ever before, when we have stuff like Consett lines flying around which let's be honest, is as bonkers as they get. Bit beyond this thread though. Seems a cheap enough job, it's just what trains tbh. RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - 54APhotography - 30 Jan 2024 (30 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm)Storx wrote I totally agreed, to be fair. Mind I think some of the slower trains wouldn't care as long as it's not too slow, if they're terminating at Newcastle anyway. Your red line is almost exactly the route of the Shildon to Newport line which crossed the ECML at Ricknall and joined the Stillington line at Redmarshall. Was a freight route and even electrified under the the NER. RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - Storx - 30 Jan 2024 (30 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm)54APhotography wrote Your red line is almost exactly the route of the Shildon to Newport line which crossed the ECML at Ricknall and joined the Stillington line at Redmarshall. Was a freight route and even electrified under the the NER. It is the line I believe, it's all still in situ ie. road bridges etc, don't believe there's any overbuild on it, at all. Don't see any reason why instead of going over the ECML, it couldn't curve onto it. Would be a massive massive coup for the likes of Bishop Auckland etc to get a direct fast connection to all the jobs without sitting on a bus for 3 hours every day. RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - 54APhotography - 30 Jan 2024 (30 Jan 2024, 4:55 pm)Storx wrote It is the line I believe, it's all still in situ ie. road bridges etc, don't believe there's any overbuild on it, at all. Don't see any reason why instead of going over the ECML, it couldn't curve onto it. Would be a massive massive coup for the likes of Bishop Auckland etc to get a direct fast connection to all the jobs without sitting on a bus for 3 hours every day.Bishop Auckland was on the main line for many years before the Hunwick route was down graded and the Aycliffe route adopted as primary RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - Storx - 30 Jan 2024 (30 Jan 2024, 5:00 pm)54APhotography wrote Bishop Auckland was on the main line for many years before the Hunwick route was down graded and the Aycliffe route adopted as primary Honestly, never knew that if I had to be honest. It's one of those lines, that should've never been shut though. We could go on all day with that list though mind. RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - 54APhotography - 30 Jan 2024 (30 Jan 2024, 5:04 pm)Storx wrote Honestly, never knew that if I had to be honest. It's one of those lines, that should've never been shut though. We could go on all day with that list though mind. True. Tyne and Wear Metro - streetdeckfan - 08 Feb 2024 Tried to get breakfast in Gateshead Spoons this morning, but the riff raff put me off enough to feel like having a play on the Metro. One thing I noticed is the stations smelled nice, unlike the last time I used the Metro where it smelled like piss. Have they got air fresheners blasting out, or was I just following nice smelling people? And if you're wondering, I got off at North Shields to get my free Cooplands breakfast Sent from my SM-F721B using Tapatalk RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - Andreos1 - 08 Feb 2024 (08 Feb 2024, 1:33 pm)streetdeckfan wrote Tried to get breakfast in Gateshead Spoons this morning, but the riff raff put me off enough to feel like having a play on the Metro. Having quite the day there aren't you. Don't go spoiling yourself anymore. One thing will lead to another and next time, it could be a Toby Carvery breakfast in an exotic part of the world! RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - streetdeckfan - 08 Feb 2024 (08 Feb 2024, 2:14 pm)Andreos1 wrote Having quite the day there aren't you. Saturday is Toby day, we usually go to the one in Darlington. In fact, rather embarrassingly they know our order off by heart! I also had a little play on a train from MetroCentre to Newcastle, just to get my money's worth out of the ticket! Now I just have to slum it back home with the commuter scum Sent from my SM-F721B using Tapatalk RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - Aaron21 - 15 May 2024 https://flic.kr/p/2pRfJug Daytime testing has begun RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - V514DFT - 29 May 2024 Thought i'd provide a list of old units and a list of new units CLASS 599's/994's 4001- Stored 4002- Scrapped 4003- Active 4004- Active 4005- Active 4006- Active 4007- Stored (likely wont return to service) 4008- Active 4009- Active 4010- Stripped for spares 4011- Active 4012- Active 4013- Active 4014- Active 4015- Active 4016- Active 4017- Active 4018- Active 4019- Active 4020- Stored (missing parts) 4021- Active 4022- Scrapped 4023- Active 4024- Active 4025- Stored 4026- Active 4027- Active 4028- Active 4029- Active 4030- Active 4031- Active 4032- Active 4033- Active 4034- Stored 4035- Active 4036- Active 4037- Active 4038- Active 4039- Active 4040- Stored and missing parts 4041- Stored 4042- Active 4043- Active 4044- Active 4045- Active 4046- Active 4047- Stored 4048- Active 4049- Active 4050- Active 4051- Active 4052- Stored (likely wont return to service) 4053- Active 4054- Active 4055- Scrapped 4056- Active 4057- Active 4058- Active 4059- Active 4060- Stored and missing parts 4061- Stored 4062- Scrapped 4063- Stored 4064- Stored 4065- Active 4066- Active 4067- Active 4068- Active 4069- Active 4070- Scrapped 4071- Active 4072- Active 4073- Active 4074- Active 4075- Active 4076- Stripped for spares 4077- Scrapped 4078- Active 4079- Active 4080- Stored 4081- Active 4082- Active 4083- Scrapped 4084- Active 4085- Active 4086- Active 4087- Active 4088- Scrapped 4089- Active 4090- Active CLASS 555's 555001- Delivered 555002- Delivered 555003- Delivered 555004- Delivered, undergoing testing 555005- Delivered, undergoing testing 555006- Pending 555007- Pending 555008- Pending 555009- Pending 555010- Pending 555011- Pending 555012- Pending 555013- Delivered 555014- Pending 555015- Delivered 555016- Pending 555017- Pending 555018- Pending 555019- Pending 555020- Delivered 555021- Delivered 555022- Pending 555023- Pending 555024- Not Built 555025- Not Built 555026- Not Built 555027- Not Built 555028- Not Built 555029- Not Built 555030- Not Built 555031- Not Built 555032- Not Built 555033- Not Built 555034- Not Built 555035- Not Built 555036- Not Built 555037- Not Built 555038- Not Built 555039- Not Built 555040- Not Built 555041- Not Built 555042- Not Built 555043- Not Built 555044- Not Built 555045- Not Built 555046- Not Built If you see any mistakes, or have any updates, please dont hesitate to private message me or quote me directly, and will happily update the list for you Cheers RE: Tyne and Wear Metro - V514DFT - 13 Jun 2024 Listed updated 13/06/24 |