Branding - Stay or go?
|
02 Nov 2023, 1:57 pm,
Post: #341
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(02 Nov 2023, 1:27 pm)V514DFT wrote 2/2A- The Villager60 spends most of its time in county durham. Personally Ive always loved the Doxford Clipper Branding. 8/78 I quite like Coast and Country, would be better if they spent more time at the coast tho. |
|||
02 Nov 2023, 1:59 pm,
Post: #342
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
Or minimal branding with the following..........
- Go North East Corporate - all services not mentioned below - CityLink (21, 56) - NE-Xpress (X10, X21, X30/X31)* - Connecting Newcastle & Gateshead (Q3, 53, 54) - COASTLINE (306, 307, 308, 309) For NE-Xpress: - All E400MMC move to Riverside Depot including Riverside operating the X30/X31. - Volvo B5TL and or StreetDecks to Consett to replace E400MMCs on X45 and X71/X72. - Consett in turn get the 12 which interworks with the 6. - X31 extended to Lanchester in place of the hourly 6 extension. Remote reliefs for X30/X31 at Eldon Square or Dunston. |
|||
02 Nov 2023, 2:09 pm,
Post: #343
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(02 Nov 2023, 1:57 pm)Unber43 wrote 60 spends most of its time in county durham. Yeah, extend them to Seaburn, make them actually Coast and Country for the summer at least. |
|||
02 Nov 2023, 2:56 pm,
Post: #344
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
Wasn't actually being serious
Kind Regards
Tez |
|||
02 Nov 2023, 3:26 pm,
Post: #345
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go? | |||
02 Nov 2023, 8:50 pm,
Post: #346
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
In all seriousness, the only routes that should be branded are:
21, X10, X21 306/307/308/309 - Joint GNE & Arriva brand for Coast Road services Everything else GNE corporate with the priority being a stable and robust network that doesn't chop & change constantly! |
|||
02 Nov 2023, 10:10 pm,
Post: #347
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(02 Nov 2023, 8:50 pm)L469 YVK wrote In all seriousness, the only routes that should be branded are:Brand the stable routes.... There loads |
|||
10 Nov 2023, 12:53 pm,
Post: #348
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
Really couldn’t care less what it says! them punters don’t read nowt anyway
|
|||
30 Dec 2023, 7:58 pm,
Post: #349
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
Was a bit bored this afternoon so I thought I would come up with a new corporate livery, inspiration came from the new South Vectis Livery on there new E400MMC's.
|
|||
31 Dec 2023, 1:26 pm,
Post: #350
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go? | |||
31 Dec 2023, 10:16 pm,
Post: #351
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go? | |||
19 Jan 2024, 7:12 am,
Post: #352
|
|||
|
|||
Branding - Stay or go? | |||
24 Jan 2024, 7:24 am,
Post: #353
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
Do those in strong support of the X66 receiving three different retro liveried vehicles believe patronage fell through the floor while the service has been running corporate/non-route branded vehicles, and believe that this latest tactic will increase loads?
|
|||
24 Jan 2024, 9:59 am,
Post: #354
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(24 Jan 2024, 7:24 am)ne14ne1 wrote Do those in strong support of the X66 receiving three different retro liveried vehicles believe patronage fell through the floor while the service has been running corporate/non-route branded vehicles, and believe that this latest tactic will increase loads? They must do. There was some conversation on here a while back, relating to the 2/2a and how the livery on there had got people talking. So must be working. Except there's a world of difference between people talking and people actually using a bus because it fulfils their requirements. 'Illegitimis non carborundum'
|
|||
25 Jan 2024, 4:42 pm,
Post: #355
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
when i used to bus it back to the rigg from wrecka punters never stopped talking about the original branding of the FAB 56 and 57 - about how " UNFAB and shite it was!!!!!"
|
|||
08 Feb 2024, 10:48 am,
Post: #356
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
https://www.facebook.com/share/mktPFPZyLUYnAD4w/
This came up on my fb reels. It took me a while to realise the copy and paste generator had been creating desire in London and this wasn't actually a part of Bensham that I didn't recognise. 'Illegitimis non carborundum'
|
|||
08 Feb 2024, 11:15 am,
Post: #357
|
|||
|
|||
Branding - Stay or go?
(08 Feb 2024, 10:48 am)Andreos1 wrote https://www.facebook.com/share/mktPFPZyLUYnAD4w/ “Stolen with pride”, as they say! Not designed by the copy and paste generator. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|||
08 Feb 2024, 11:41 am,
Post: #358
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
Owned by Passenger Plus, Tadworth who specialise in Corporate Contracts and Rail Replacement.
They have four of them all entering service in September 2023. YD73FRV YD73FRX YD73FRU YD73FRZ They seem to be very elusive to cameras, and probably running a closed door contract or even operating somewhere that isn't publically accessible. Chances of that one in the reel might have been heading to or from the depot. There is a photo of one on their website - https://www.passengerplus.co.uk/our-fleet.htm |
|||
08 Feb 2024, 11:53 am,
Post: #359
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(08 Feb 2024, 11:15 am)Dan wrote “Stolen with pride”, as they say! You're telling us that the copy and paste generator has had his ideas erm, copy and pasted by someone else? The irony is delicious! 'Illegitimis non carborundum'
|
|||
08 Feb 2024, 12:49 pm,
Post: #360
|
|||
|
|||
Branding - Stay or go?
Surely given it's a blatant copy GNE would be well within their rights to go after them for copyright infringement on the design?
Sent from my SM-F721B using Tapatalk |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|