Branding - Stay or go?
|
08 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm,
Post: #361
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go? | |||
08 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm,
Post: #362
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go? | |||
08 Feb 2024, 4:18 pm,
Post: #363
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(08 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm)streetdeckfan wrote Copyright is an automatic right, unlike a trademark which you have to apply for. I see. Every day’s a school day as they say. EXTREMELY lazy of the operator/designer. They could have at least swapped out the green bit for another colour. |
|||
08 Feb 2024, 6:55 pm,
Post: #364
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
Design looks more closer to the simplified Q3 version with Green being used instead of yellow compared the 53/54 version which has less green on the front and the green fades to white in the middle of the swoosh.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gjm-photog...1916867759 https://www.flickr.com/photos/gjm-photog...3368518302 |
|||
08 Feb 2024, 10:18 pm,
Post: #365
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(08 Feb 2024, 1:26 pm)streetdeckfan wrote Copyright is an automatic right, unlike a trademark which you have to apply for. They would be laughed out of the courtroom. A contractor in Kent using a green swoosh on a bus that clearly doesn’t operate or is pretending to operate for Go Ahead. Just look at Aldi and their imitation is flattery approach
Wistfully stuck in the 90s
|
|||
09 Feb 2024, 10:55 am,
Post: #366
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(08 Feb 2024, 10:18 pm)Ambassador wrote They would be laughed out of the courtroom. Because of the copyright claim or because of a certain fashionistas outfit? Maybe even both! 'Illegitimis non carborundum'
|
|||
09 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm,
Post: #367
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
More than half the buses on the Angel today aren't Angelic (including a Versa)
2 of the Angels are covering on the X21 which would suggest Riverside have got Stevie Wonder on allocations again or there's a double deck shortage since the January changes |
|||
09 Feb 2024, 3:46 pm,
Post: #368
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(09 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm)Ambassador wrote More than half the buses on the Angel today aren't Angelic (including a Versa)they go hand in hand |
|||
09 Feb 2024, 6:41 pm,
Post: #369
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(09 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm)Ambassador wrote More than half the buses on the Angel today aren't Angelic (including a Versa)My money would be on Stevie Wonder doing allocations. Since there are still services being cancelled at short-notice, presumably including an X45 I happened to be waiting for yesterday (cancelled or well over 30 mins late), there surely can't be a shortage of double-deckers. EDIT: Not to mention there was a double-decker doing a poor impression of a Voltra on the 54 I saw whilst waiting at Central Station for the X45. Sent from my SM-A526B using Tapatalk |
|||
09 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm,
Post: #370
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
appertnly gne 5426 has been repainted any photos???
(09 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm)Graphite39A/39B/39 wrote appertnly gne 5426 has been repainted any photos??? |
|||
09 Feb 2024, 9:44 pm,
Post: #371
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go? | |||
22 Feb 2024, 6:37 pm,
Post: #372
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
Stagecoach is known to be a highly aggressive company, they’d doubtless gan after GNE if they thought it was too similar to their own
|
|||
22 Feb 2024, 10:56 pm,
Post: #373
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
Get rid of the lot absolutely pointless nowadays. 51 52 57 constantly have angels on them
Xlines on these routes too Go north east needs to just co corporate with all vehicles |
|||
25 Feb 2024, 9:47 am,
Post: #374
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go? | |||
25 Feb 2024, 2:36 pm,
Post: #375
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go? | |||
25 Feb 2024, 8:45 pm,
Post: #376
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(25 Feb 2024, 9:47 am)Ex-conductor wrote I fully agree. Arriva have been the worst example of misuse of branding for years. Aye
Former PTE driver many year back. Turned over a new leaf since my last time here
|
|||
25 Feb 2024, 10:08 pm,
Post: #377
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
Only routes that should be branded are....
- CityLink - 21, 56 - CityConnEct - Q3, 53, 54 - COASTLINE (in conjunction with Arriva) - 306, 307, 308, 309.........and any route that runs out of Arriva's Blyth depot ! - NE-Xpress - X10, X21 - X66 - Corporate base with basic route info Everything else.....corporate! |
|||
25 Feb 2024, 11:49 pm,
Post: #378
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
I don’t think anything needs branding and the last few weeks have proven this. X21 is being run by literally anything, Crusaders and East Gateshead Riders in Brandon. Angels in Winlaton. Country Rangers on the 28/9, It makes no difference, it’s not going to grow numbers
|
|||
25 Feb 2024, 11:59 pm,
Post: #379
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
There’s nee point sticking these daft names on if their ganna move all the buses about anyway.
|
|||
26 Feb 2024, 7:05 am,
Post: #380
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Branding - Stay or go?
(25 Feb 2024, 10:08 pm)L469 YVK wrote Only routes that should be branded are....Possibly Citylink X20 ..( linking Durham to Sunderland) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|