(15 May 2024, 11:15 am)Aaron21 wrote I'd say 308 to Stagecoach and run the 306 standalone
To be honest, the 306 wouldn't be a bad little operation for Stagecoach but I doubt Arriva would give them up anytime soon unless forced by Kim!
Skip to main content
(19 Jul 2024, 11:06 pm)PH - BQA wrote I'm sure Michael will be along shortly to post this with the correct formatting and full details, but some interesting Arriva Northumbria registrations have appeared on the DVSA (all for September unless stated otherwise):
4X16: Wooler to Kelso (via Morpeth, Longframlington, Wooler)
3X16: Longframlington to Wooler (via Morpeth, Longframlington, Wooler)
2X16: Morpeth to Longframlington (via Morpeth, Longframlington, Wooler)
392: Marden Estate to HMRC Benton Park View (via Wallsend)
678: Hadrian Lodge to St Thomas More Academy
664: Burnside College to Wallsend (via Battle Hill)
Also variations to:
35 - Effective from 21st July ending on 31st August
44
777
1X16 (assume linked to Wooler/Kelso registration)
X21 - As 35
654
X30
693
306/308
699
And cancellations to:
47
116
656
105
553
Assume the X16 change is BSIP funded, and will see the interworking end with the 777.
I can't see any registration from GNE or Stagecoach which replaces the 47 or 553, maybe the 44 variation will cover the 47? That said, Stannington has disappeared from the 44 registration so maybe that's gone the distance.
(20 Jul 2024, 8:31 am)NMS26222 wrote Arriva used to operate into Jedburgh from Wooler in the early days, think it was linked to the food factory in the area at the time.
(20 Jul 2024, 8:22 am)Andreos1 wrote That X16 is certainly an interesting one.
First ANE service to Scotland too?
(20 Jul 2024, 10:16 am)Storx wrote 710 possibly? Unsure how it's funded as the freedom request only mentions the Saturday run, not the Wednesday one, but when you already have a bus service doing a chunk of the route it gives you a chance to undercut Glen Valley. Be a shame though as they've had it for years.
(20 Jul 2024, 2:17 pm)Andreos1 wrote I think we all know BSIP hasn't been used as it could be, but I'd hope the two were to run in sync and complement each other - or at the very least, offer a slight alternative/variation.
The current 710 timetable doesn't really lend itself to the ANE network unless there's some dead running at the Kelso end.
(20 Jul 2024, 4:43 pm)whg1070 wrote Why do you say that BSIP hasn't been used as it could be? We'd have never seen services like the 777 without it! I suspect the X16 will be a replacement for the 710, but we'll have to wait and see.
(20 Jul 2024, 5:38 pm)Andreos1 wrote Mainly in T&W.
The Derwentside to Newcastle services and the 20A being two examples off the top of my head, where older routes were re-introduced.
Rather than new services, like the airport 777.
(20 Jul 2024, 5:54 pm)PH - BQA wrote Northumberland County Council seem to have been much better at using their funding, with improved evening and Sunday services, new/extended routes, and improved frequencies on corridors which could grow.
(20 Jul 2024, 8:46 pm)Shrek wrote When I was working at the Freeman, I'm sure I remember hearing that Arriva only had the contract for the 553 for another year. If that's the case, then it would make sense that maybe Arriva won't be running it from September if either they've decided to walk away, or the Hospital Trust has found a cheaper option.
I think it could be possible that they might look to tag the 47 onto the end of the 44 route. Supposedly they need to make sure the new electric buses are on the routes they were funded for, so that would make sense if they have to make changes to boards for that. I think there is 0% chance the 44 will be rerouted to take on the 553 route though.
(20 Jul 2024, 8:46 pm)Shrek wrote When I was working at the Freeman, I'm sure I remember hearing that Arriva only had the contract for the 553 for another year. If that's the case, then it would make sense that maybe Arriva won't be running it from September if either they've decided to walk away, or the Hospital Trust has found a cheaper option.
I think it could be possible that they might look to tag the 47 onto the end of the 44 route. Supposedly they need to make sure the new electric buses are on the routes they were funded for, so that would make sense if they have to make changes to boards for that. I think there is 0% chance the 44 will be rerouted to take on the 553 route though.
(20 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm)Storx wrote Personally I can't see the 44 and 47 being merged as it would completely break the interworking pattern at Haymarket.
Remember it's:
43 -> 44 -> 45 -> 43 or 43 -> 45 -> 44 -> 43
Doing:
43 -> 45 -> 44 -> 44 -> 45 -> 43 -> 43 -> 43, just wouldn't work at all.
Personally I wouldn't be surprised to see the H and 47 merged personally, not sure the Haymarket links are really needed when there's the 36 doing the link. The H badly needs a frequency upgrade through the core though.